Volume 3, Issue 4, December 2019, Page: 84-88
Factors Indicating on Differentiated Approach in Treatment of Severe Focal Brain Injures
Mitalip Mamytov, Department of Neurosurgery, Kyrgyz State Medical Academy, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
Received: Oct. 2, 2019;       Accepted: Nov. 8, 2019;       Published: Nov. 17, 2019
DOI: 10.11648/j.cnn.20190304.13      View  20      Downloads  5
Abstract
Background: Modern methods of complex diagnostics in neurotraumatology, in particular computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), enable neurosurgeons to make a differentiated approach to choosing the right method for treating traumatic and other brain injuries. Objective: To elaborate criteria for differentiated treatment of severe focal traumatic brain injuries. Methods: Results of treatment in 126 patients with severe craniocerebral injury have been examined, 74 of them were undergone to surgical methods of treatment, and 52 patients were treated conservatively. To all patients computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging procedures of the brain were done. The results of treatment were assessed using Glasgow Outcome Scale. Criteria for selection of patients were fact of severe isolated craniocerebral injury, depth and time of loss of consciousness, availability of СТ and МRI of brain in dynamics, and operational findings. Results: It was determined а high degree of possibility of tomographic objectification and consecutive transformation of substrates of injured brain. It is noted, that the most frequent traumatization is observed for frontal (43.4%) and temporal (40.5%) brain lobes. Conclusions: Introduction of differentiated approach to using conservative and surgical methods of treatment for severe traumatic cerebral contusion and hematomas of brain, and preference of conservative treatment led to greater efficiency and adequacy of treatment of these patients.
Keywords
Severe Craniocerebral Injury, Cerebral Contusions, Differentiated Treatment
To cite this article
Mitalip Mamytov, Factors Indicating on Differentiated Approach in Treatment of Severe Focal Brain Injures, Clinical Neurology and Neuroscience. Vol. 3, No. 4, 2019, pp. 84-88. doi: 10.11648/j.cnn.20190304.13
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Dobrokhotova ТА. Outcomes of craniocerebral injury In: Neurotraumatology, М., 1994; p. 84-86.
[2]
Konovalov AN. Surgery of consequences of craniocerebral injury, Мoscow. 2006; 55-62.
[3]
Konovalov, VN Kornienko, Pronin IN. Magnetic-resonance tomography in neurosurgery, Мoscow, "Viidar". 1997.
[4]
Likhterman LB, Kornienko VN, Potapov АА. Prognosis of course and outcomes. Мoscow, Book LTD., 1993.
[5]
Likhterman LB, Potapov АА, Кravchuk AD. Modern approaches to diagnosis and treatment of craniocerebral injury and its consequences, Issues of Neurosurgery, 1996; l, 35-37.
[6]
Potapov АА. Evidence-based Neurotraumatology. Мoscow; 2003.
[7]
Cho Dy. Glasgow Coma Scale and hematoma volume as criteria for treatment of putaminal and thalamic intracerebral hemorrhage, Surg. Neurol., 2008; 70, 628-633.
[8]
Juvela S. The treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhages. А prospective randomized trial of surgical and conservative treatment, J. Neurosurg., 1989; 70, 755-758.
[9]
Proust F. Spontaneous supratentorial cerebral hemorrhage: Role of surgical treatment, Neurochirurgie, 2007; 59, 58-65.
[10]
Sun DTF. Intracerebral hematoma: Operative versus non-operative, Ann Coll Surg., 2004; 8, 55-58.
[11]
Hu Y, Cao J, Hou X, Liu G. MIS score: Prediction model for minimally invasive surgery, World Neurosurg., 2017; 99, 624-629.
[12]
Yamashiro S, Hitoshi Y, Yoshida A, Kuratsu J. Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery for comatose patients with large supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhages, Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)., 2015; 55, 819-823.
[13]
Kuhnt D, Bauer, M, Nimsky C. Multimodality navigation in neurosurgery. In F. Jolesz (Ed.), Intraoperative Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, New York, NY: Springer Heidelberg., 2014; 497–506.
[14]
Navbavi A, Handels H. Brain shift and updated intraoper-ative navigation with intraoperative MRI. In F. Jolesz (Ed.), Intraoperative Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, New York, NY: Springer Heidelberg., 2014; 485–498.
[15]
Esquenazi Y, Savitz SI, El Khoury R, McIntosh MA, Grotta JC, Tandon N et al. Decompressive hemicraniectomy with or without clot evacuation for large spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhages, Clin Neurol Neurosurg., 2015; 128, 117-22.
[16]
Zan X, Li H, Liu W, Fang Y, Ma J, Lan Z et al. Endoscopic surgery versus conservative treatment for the moderate-volume hematoma in spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage (ECMOH): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, BMC Neurol., 2012; 12: 34.
[17]
Tanin AP, Golovko AM, Smeyanovich AF. Results of surgery of hypertensive intracerebral hematomas of supratentorial localization, Russian neurosurgical journal named after Polenov AL, 2013; 5, 155-157.
[18]
Onysko OV, Rychkov AV. Reducing risk factors in surgery for combined intracranial injuries, Russian neurosurgical journal named after Polenov AL, 2013; 5, 45-46.
Browse journals by subject